寤堥杸鑸堥姵鍢夐€�(j矛n)鍑哄彛鏈夐檺瑷�(sh猫)鍌欐湁闄愬叕鍙稿潗钀戒簬绂忓缓寤堥杸锛屾キ(y猫)鍕�(w霉)鑼冨湇閬嶅強鑿澅銆佽彲鍗�銆佽彲鍖椼€佽タ鍗楃瓑鍏ㄥ湅鍚勫湴銆備富鐕烡CS鎺у埗绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢锛孭LC绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢鍙婃(j墨)鍣ㄤ汉绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢锛屽劒(y艒u)鍕㈠搧鐗岋細Allen Bradley銆丅entlyNevada銆丄BB銆丒merson Ovation銆丠oneywell DCS銆丼iemens銆俁ockwell ICS Triplex銆丗OXBORO銆丼chneider PLC銆丟E? Fanuc銆丮otorola銆丠IMA銆丳rosoft绛夊悇绋€�(j矛n)鍙ｅ伐妤�(y猫)闆堕儴浠�锛屽叕鍙稿绲傜鎵库€滆獱淇°€侀珮鏁�銆佸叡璐�銆佸壍(chu脿ng)鏂扳€濈殑缍�(j墨ng)鐕熺悊蹇�锛屾湰钁椻€滆唱(zh矛)閲忎繚璀夛紝瑾犱俊鏈嶅嫏(w霉)锛屽鎴惰嚦涓娾€濈殑鍋氫簨鎱�(t脿i)搴︽湇鍕�(w霉)浜庢瘡涓€浣嶆柊鑰佸鎴�锛屼緷鎵樺挤(qi谩ng)鏈夌鐖姏鐨勭敘(ch菐n)鍝佸児鏍硷紝榫愬ぇ鐨勫韩瀛�锛岄亷纭殑璩�(zh矛)閲�, 蹇嵎鐨勮波鏈熶互鍙婂叏鏂逛綅鐨勫敭鍓嶅挩瑭€€佸敭鍚庢湇鍕�(w霉)锛屾寔绾�(x霉)鐐哄唬澶у鎴舵彁渚涘劒(y艒u)璩�(zh矛)鐨勭敘(ch菐n)鍝�锛屼富鐕熺敘(ch菐n)鍝佸唬娉涙湇鍕�(w霉)浜庨浕瀛愩€佸喍閲�銆佸寲宸�銆侀浕寤犮€侀嫾寤�銆佹鑶犮€佹按娉�銆佹(j墨)姊拌ō(sh猫)鍌�銆佺瓚寤虹瓑琛屾キ(y猫)銆傚挩瑭細15359273791? 18059259367
鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄鈽呪槄
涓荤嚐鐢�(ch菐n)鍝�锛屽倷浠朵緵鎳�(y墨ng)锛屽厖瓒冲韩瀛�
Foxboro锛�?锛熸€傚叡顭塤锛夛細I/A Series绯荤当(t菕ng)锛孎(xi脿n)BM鍏ㄧ郴鍒楋紙鐝�(xi脿n)鍫磋几鍏�/杓稿嚭妯″锛�
闋嗗簭鎺у埗銆佹褰㈤倧杓帶鍒�銆佷簨鏁呰拷鎲惰檿鐞嗐€佹暩(sh霉)妯¤綁(zhu菐n)鎻�銆佽几鍏�/杓稿嚭淇¤櫉铏曠悊銆�
鏁�(sh霉)鎿�(j霉)閫氫俊鍙婅檿鐞嗙瓑銆�
Westinghouse锛堣タ灞嬶級锛�1C31绯诲垪DCS绯荤当(t菕ng)銆丆PU銆丱VATION绯荤当(t菕ng)銆乄DPF绯荤当(t菕ng)銆�
WEStation绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢銆�
Triconex锛堣嫳缍€濓級:鍐椾綑瀹归尟鎺у埗绯荤当(t菕ng)銆佸熀浜庝笁閲嶆ā浠跺啑浣欙紙TMR锛夌祼(ji茅)妲�(g貌u)鐨勭従(xi脿n)浠ｅ寲鐨勫閷帶鍒跺櫒銆�
EMERSON锛堣壘榛樼敓锛�:妯″銆佸崱浠�銆侀﹨(q奴)鍕曞櫒绛夊悇椤炲倷浠躲€�
XYCOM锛歑VME绯诲垪
Bently锛堟湰鐗瑰埄锛夛細3500/3300绯荤当(t菕ng)銆�
Rockwell锛堢緟鍏嬮煁鐖撅級锛欼CS绯荤当(t菕ng)銆�
ABB锛歅M鍏ㄧ郴鍒桪CS绯荤当(t菕ng)銆両GCT楂樺璁婇牷鍣ㄧ郴鍒�銆佸伐妤�(y猫)姗�(j墨)鍣ㄤ汉鍌欎欢DSQC绯诲垪銆両NFI 90绛夈€�
Bailey锛堣矟鍒╋級锛欱RC绯诲垪DCS绯荤当(t菕ng)绛�銆�
Allen-Bradley锛�1756銆�1785銆�1771銆�1746鍏ㄧ郴鍒楃郴绲�(t菕ng)绛�銆�
Yokogawa锛堟┇娌筹級锛欳P绯诲垪绛夈€�
Honeywell锛堥湇灏奸煁鐖撅級锛歍K/TC/CC绯荤当(t菕ng)绛�銆�
Reliance锛堢憺鎭╋級锛�57C绯诲垪绛�銆�
Schneider锛堟柦鑰愬痉锛夛細140绯诲垪铏曠悊鍣ㄣ€佹帶鍒跺崱銆侀浕婧愭ā濉婄瓑銆�
Modicon锛堣帿杩悍锛夛細AS绯诲垪PLC绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢銆�
Siemens(瑗块杸瀛�)锛�6ES5/6ES7414/6ES7415/6ES7416绯诲垪PLC绯荤当(t菕ng)鍌欎欢銆�
Siemens MOORE锛孲iemens Simatic C1锛孲iemens鏁�(sh霉)鎺х郴绲�(t菕ng)绛�銆�
Motorola锛堟懇鎵樼緟鎷夛級锛歁VME 162銆丮VME 167銆丮VME1772銆丮VME177绛夌郴鍒�銆�
XYCOM锛欼/O銆乂ME鏉垮拰铏曠悊鍣ㄧ瓑銆�
GE锛堥€氱敤闆绘埃锛夛細IC698/IC697鍏ㄧ郴鍒桺LC绯荤当(t菕ng)銆佹ā濉娿€佸崱浠�銆侀﹨(q奴)鍕曞櫒绛夊悇椤炲倷浠�銆�
Yaskawa锛堝畨宸濓級锛氫己鏈嶆帶鍒跺櫒銆佷己鏈嶉Μ閬�(d谩)銆佷己鏈嶉﹨(q奴)鍕曞櫒銆�
Bosch Rexroth锛堝崥涓栧姏澹▊锛夛細Indramat锛孖/O妯″,PLC鎺у埗鍣�,椹�(q奴)鍕曟ā濉婄瓑銆�
Woodward锛堜紞寰锋矁寰凤級锛歋PC闁ヤ綅鎺у埗鍣ㄣ€丳EAK150鏁�(sh霉)瀛楁帶鍒跺櫒銆�
How to choose between PLC and DCS depends on the specific project and plant type. Because of different applications, the requirements of the control system are also different.
In addition to some basic criteria, we must also consider the installation, scalability, maintenance and other factors. Sometimes, one choice is very suitable for a factory, and in another case it may not be. Therefore, the more factors considered in the selection of control system, the more conducive to the realization of short-term and long-term goals.
At present, although PLC system may be the most cost-effective for small equipment, DCS system provides more economical scalability and is more likely to obtain higher initial return on investment.
PLC is suitable for discrete production, generally composed of separate production devices, mainly used to complete the assembly of components, such as labeling, filling or grinding. DCS is suitable for process manufacturing. Automated systems are often used to produce by recipe rather than by piece in a continuous and batch manner. Large scale continuous processing equipment, such as refineries and chemical plants, all use DCS system. Mixed application usually uses PLC and DCS at the same time.
鈻� process scale:
Small system (<300 i / o points) may have less budget, so plc is more suitable. dcs has a b database, which is easier to manage and upgrade, and can play a more important role in large factory applications.
鈻� upgrade plan:
PLC system can be selected for small-scale industrial process, but if the process needs to be expanded or upgraded, more PLC hardware and database need to be added, and independent maintenance is needed. This process is time-consuming and laborious, and prone to errors. At this time, DCS is more suitable. As DCS is easier to upgrade, it can also manage users&锛�39; trust from the central hub, so it is easier for later maintenance.
Integration requirements:
For stand-alone device, PLC is the ideal choice. When the factory configures multiple PLCs, it will produce the requirement of interconnection. This is generally difficult to implement because it is usually necessary to map data using communication protocols. Especially when the user needs to change, once a PLC system is changed, the two PLCs may not communicate normally. DCS does not need mapping, configuration change is just a simple process, the controller is the system&锛�39;s own.
灏堟敞锛岃獱淇�銆侀珮鏁�銆佸叡璐�銆�?鎴戝€戝皥娉ㄤ簬宸ユキ(y猫)鑷嫊鍖栫敘(ch菐n)鍝侀姺鍞緪澶у韩瀛樼瓑鎮ㄨ鍍�鐩存帴寰炲伐寤犲拰姝愭床缍�(j墨ng)閵峰晢鎷胯波锛岀渷鍘讳腑闁撶挵(hu谩n)绡€(ji茅)锛岀郸鎮ㄦ彁渚涙洿鍎�(y艒u)鍕�
閭勬湁鏇村搴瓨鍨嬭櫉锛�
MOTOROLA MVME162-012
MOTOROLA MVME162-10
MOTOROLA MVME162-13
MOTOROLA MVME162-220
MOTOROLA MVME162-512
MOTOROLA MVME162-512A
MOTOROLA 01-W3960B/61C
MOTOROLA CPCI-6020TM
MOTOROLA MVME162-210
MOTOROLA MVME2301-900
MOTOROLA MVME2604 712I/O
MOTOROLA MVME300
MOTOROLA MVME712/M
MOTOROLA 30-W2960B01A
MOTOROLA FAB 0340-1049
MOTOROLA MVME162-533A
MOTOROLA MVME162PA-344
MOTOROLA MVME172-263/260
MOTOROLA MVME188A
MOTOROLA TMCP700
MOTOROLA W33378F
MOTOROLA MVME5100
MOTOROLA MVME172-533
MOTOROLA MVME715P
MOTOROLA MVME712A/AM
MOTOROLA MVME705B
MOTOROLA MVME147SRF
MOTOROLA MVME335
MOTOROLA MVME333-2
MOTOROLA FLN4234A
MOTOROLA VME172PA-652SE
MOTOROLA 01-W3324F
MOTOROLA BOARD 466023
MOTOROLA MVME172PA-652SE
MOTOROLA MVME162-223
MOTOROLA IPMC7616E-002
MOTOROLA MVME2434
MOTOROLA MVME147S-1
MOTOROLA MVME162-212
MOTOROLA MVME5500
MOTOROLA MVME162PA-344E
MOTOROLA MVME2305-900
MOTOROLA MPC2004
MOTOROLA FLN3524A
MOTOROLA MVME-147A
MOTOROLA CPU3640
MOTOROLA MVME5500-0161
MOTOROLA MVME2400
